With numerous available cross-browser testing options, It can be not easy to decide which is the most suitable for your application. Even though Selenium was the most popular platform for a long time, Cypress and Playwright are well-known alternatives that are gaining traction in the automatic testing arena and allowing development teams to test effectively by their specific requirements.
If you’re weighing the pros and cons of Playwright against. Cypress, Continue reading to find out what each one can offer, along with some helpful suggestions to help you find the most effective cross-browser testing method for your application success.
All About Playwright
Microsoft Playwright was developed by the same group that created Puppeteer, among the hottest cross-browser testing tools. While Playwright is similar to Puppeteer in many ways, Playwright surpasses Puppeteer’s ability to support Chrome, WebKit, and Firefox browsers.
Additional capabilities of Playwright are:
- Mobile-based native emulation that is part of Google Chrome for Android with Mobile Safari.
- The mobile rendering engine for desktops and the cloud.
- Auto-wait, assertions about web-first, and the tracing.
- Monitoring of network activity to prevent mocking and stubbing network requests.
- Input from the mouse that is native to the keyboard.
- The ability to upload or download documents.
All About Cypress
The recent release of Cypress 10 other features, such as testing components, a migration tool, a refreshed UX, and a new UI experience, enhance the widely-used testing software.
Other features that Cypress has Cypress include:
- Time travel (or real-time debugging of software).
- Testing APIs and Network Control.
- Innovative components testing, mocking, and stubbing.
- AXE accessibility and additional plugins.
- Additional features added with Cypress 10 update. Cypress 10 update.
Why Playwright Proves To Be Best?
While both end-to-end testing platforms accomplish the same purpose, Cypress and Playwright test the process differently.
Cypress is considered to be more like a “package offering” compared to Playwright since it provides folders with examples of documents that aid testing teams, even though testers are required to adhere to the current testing framework’s restrictions.
Playwright, however, does not generate files but allows you to select your test framework for running. Playwright offers more flexibility over Cypress in this way and is compatible with different browsers.
In the case of Playwright and. Cypress testing, the ideal option is determined by your program’s particular requirements and the degree of flexibility compared with the structure required to conduct your automated tests.
The final decision of the cross-platform testing platform to use comes down to what features are most crucial to your particular application and the testing most beneficial for your product.
When comparing Playwright and Cypress, the benefits of each one is based on what you want to achieve in your experience testing.
Therefore, Playwright is a Node.js library that utilizes an API that can simplify Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit. It was created to allow robust, reliable, and effective automated testing of browsers.
Playwright also allows for the automation of Microsoft Edge since it is built on the open-source Chromium web-based framework. LambdaTest lets you run Playwright tests on 3000+ authentic browsers and operating system combinations.